NATURE POETRY OF W.B. YEATS AND
STEPHEN GILL
Dr. G.L. Gautam
Wordsworth holds that “a poet is
endued with more lovely sensibility, more enthusiasm and tenderness.”8
In other words, a
poet experiences emotions more deeply than other human beings do. This is true
also with any poet
who has love for nature. This love goes beyond time and space. The golden light
emanating from the rising and setting sun has since time immemorial stirred poet’s
imagination. Even the Neoclassical poets during the eighteenth century, who
held nature in contempt,
admitted the beauty that
lay in simple and contented life, though these poets produced a small corpus of
poetry dealing with nature. With the innate bent that a poet has towards
nature, even today he enjoys the sparrows fluttering their wings in summer.
This is despite the facts that under the conditions of urban living, a poet has to live
amidst the jungle of high rise buildings which hide horizon from his view. The poet thus enjoys nature as an aesthete
which does not imply he ever neglected the human sufferings.
As early as first century before
Christ, Horace in his odes draws immensely on nature and on life of ploughman.
He uses nature variously by imparting human metaphor to winds and fields,
representing super natural power of nature gods, and also representing nature
as a great leveler between the rich and the poor. Like Horace, Tagore makes us
aware of the fact how the Vedic poets saw in nature both divine and human
spirits.“ The rivers and clouds, dawn, fire and storm
were not scientific facts to them but the manifestation of the divine law.”9
So nature and human life are not two
words apart without converging anywhere. Man can cultivate his love for both.
It is possible if
he is not cut off from the world of flora and fauna and lives in less
materially conscious society. In a materially conscious society, since the love
of money takes away all other loves, man gets alienated from man and nature.
Alienated from man, he seeks refuge in religion and approaches the landscape of nature as
a stranger, but both W.B. Yeats and Stephen Gill are not strangers to nature.
W.B. Yeats emerges as a significant
modern poet after the publication of The Tower (1933) and The Winding
Stair And Other Poems (1933). Due to striking
simplicity of diction, his poetry won a
wide readership. This simplicity is
striking also in the nature poetry of W.B. Yeats. But in the content, the dichotomy it presents
between nature and world is wide. In
contrast with human world, his poetry of nature is enchanting, uncanny and
mysterious. Taking an overall view of themes, among which nature is a
significant area in Yeats poetry, Augustine Martin comments:
Behind all the masks
and beneath several voices there is same probing passionate intelligence, the
same importunate self being endlessly remade. This is equally true of Yeats
other themes art nature the soul, polities, history landscape, myth, philosophy
and god (Preface To
Yeats)
The question is why Yeats, a poet of
awareness and intelligence, plays down the ills of industrialism as did Alfred
Tennyson. The reason why the twentieth century criticism disapproves the great poets such as
Tennyson and Yeats may be answered in the words of Humbert Wolfe:
Steadily thereafter
in the beginning of twentieth century the revolt against Tennyson’s
dictatorship asserted itself. Tennyson had represented the industrial age in
its years of self-complacency and self-satisfaction mitigated by doubts and
occasioned by satiety. The new writers were beginning to be aware of the cruel
wounds that the age had inflicted on the spirit of man. They were no mere
long-haired aesthetes, trilling rondeawx and offering absinthe to thirsty
world. They were man aware of something fast and fateful sweeping on to some
disastrous consummation. The great poet of the period, Honsman, de la More and
Yeats all played to low and troubled note.5
Another poet who is not a stranger
to nature is Stephen Gill, an internationally known poet of Indian diaspora who lives in
The majority of critics, who have
written about Gill’s poetry, have seen him as a poet of peace and harmony. His nature
poetry that constitutes a significant area of his whole poetic corpus has been
largely neglected. Ravichandran is right when he says:
Yet the excess of
criticism that focuses on these overt aspects fail to highlight other subtly
significant features of Gill’s poems, particularly a much ignored feature that
is very much embedded in these aspects in the poet’s concern for nature,
environment and ecological balance.7
In literary landscape, the modern
poets appear on the horizon with the sole objective of showing the angst the
modern man faces in his existential predicament. For example T.S. Eliot shows his preoccupation
with the predicaments of love and sex and comes up with solution that man
should live with fears of death. So nature in mainstream modern poetry receives
scant attention. Some poets who have been imbued with democratic socialist
vision went to the streets in search of theme and idiom. A poet thus earns what Walter
Benjamin called the appellation if he takes his hero from commoners. The
postmodern times have witnessed the unprecedented technological advancement
that results in jeoparying the land, sky, lakes and
ocean. So the creative writers have devoted to nature enough space making good
the setback it suffered in mainstream modern poetry. Moreover, the concern for
protection of environment and movements for maintaining ecological balance have
of late staged centre stage. Stephen Gill is one of them. In Year After Year, he says:
Heavy taxes
less service
higher unemployment
financial obligation
more elderly persons
soaring prices
increase in terrorism
shortage of physicians
violence on the streets
no security
abuse of the earth
ecosystem
legacy of garbage piles.
In A New Canadian in Toronto, Gill graphically describes how life in a
metropolis is unproductive and uninspiring, and human warmth has been
causality. What is true of
My mind and body remain engaged all
the time
grabbing some bones.
The lips of the city
smell like plastic flowers
and eyes display the festivals of
the orphans
souls carry hidden wounds.
(Shrine, 102)
By 1890s when W.B. Yeats was
settling in
We can thus understand the longing
Yeats expresses in Lake Isle of Insfree .
The distracting
And
I shall have some peace there, for peace comes dropping slow,
Dropping
from the veils of the morning to where the cricket sings
There
midnight’s all a glimmer and noon a purple glow
And
evening full of the linnet wings
(The Rose, 1893, 35)
Since the urbanization swallowed the
land where nature abounded the nature with linnet became wings distant, remote
and therefore alien. As a result, the life turns into monotonous drudgery.
Added to it is the fact how the egotistical calculation, with ulterior motives
working behind human relationship,5
irreparably upset an individual’s psyche, resulting in loss of trust. Left
alone to fend himself, an individual feels less secure than in community. So
the peace turns out to be a sought after thing as other usable things are. In
the poem Peace of Mind, Stephen Gill focuses on the fact that peace of mind is
difficult to be had, since an individual gets hurt after hurt. In the case of the poet a hurt is more deeply
felt that is obvious in these lines:
Whenever I think of you
lightning thunders
in the lone sameness of my
retreat
(Shrine, 119)
Whereas nostalgic note is obviously
striking in Lake Isle of Innsfree, the mystical note is
deeper in Yeats other early lyrics. Here it is deeper than the Keatsean odes. For example in Ode to a Nightingale, Keats finds it unbearable to bear the fever
and fret of life and therefore escape into the green leaves where the
nightingale is singing. The poem also relates the song of the nightingale to
magic and mystery:
Charmed magic casements, opening on
the foam
of perilous seas, in faery lands
forlorn.
The fresh joy that the nightingale’s
song contains has ever been fresh through history and even before history had
begun. Like Keats, Yeats shows the
contrast between the timelessness of the world of fairies and fluxing or
temporal character of the human world. In Fairy
Song, Yeats, to a large extent, humanizes the fairies who wish to give
silence, love and quiet of night to children.
We who are old, old and go
O so old
Thousands of years, thousands of
years
Of all were told
Give to these children, new from the
world
Silence and love,
And the long dew dropping hours of
the night and stars above
(The Rose, 34)
In the example of fairies, Yeats
seems to express his wish to bring up children in an affectionate environment.
He probably would have seen children with tense looks in schools of
Gives to these Children, new form
the world
Rest far from men,
Is anything better? any thing better
Tell us then (35)
The song is striking
both for its lyrical simplicity and touch of humanism. Contrary to it, the
poem, Stolen Child, demonstrates
Yeats predilection for fantasizing nature and he correspondingly presents human
life in sordid light, devaluing human existence and its concerns. The
existential concerns, Yeats suggests, are incomprehensible, more of a riddle,
therefore unworthy of serious notice. The following alliteration shows how
Yeats dismisses the world’s weeping as something incomprehensible:
Come away, O human Child
To the waters and the wild
With a faery, hand in hand
For the world is more full of
weeping than
Than you can understand..
(From Cross ways 1889, 16)
Nature mystical poetry predicates on
certain fundamental premises. First it essentially deals with super reality or
dream world, focusing on magic and fairies. Secondly, the world so subjectively
constructed is supposed to be hallowed with antiquity and so supposed to be
superior to the existential reality and latter due to its fluxing character is
regarded as inferior. Thirdly, nature is treated something remote, having an
isolated existence described with super natural attributes such as wonder world
etc. What follows from the latter aspect or what results from an obsession
with, poet’s transcendental love of nature is viewing a spirit in nature. For
example, Wordsworth views a spirit in these lines And
I have felt / A presence that disturbs me with joy (Tentern
Abbey, Lyrical Ballads, 116)
The following lines of Stolen Child are typically mystical and
escapist wherein the ontological troubles have been shown in poor light and
nature shown as an ideal refuse:
And chase the frothy bubbles, /
While the world is full of troubles
and is anxious in its sleep.
(17)
As Yeats advanced in years, his
idiom and style moved towards modernity. His attitude also changed, thereby
humanizing nature. Nevertheless, when it came to giving expression to nature
and struggles on the streets, the latter were treated contemptuously. So much
so, that even the cause of Irish Independence, a subject so dear to his heart,
seemed to him unworthy. The legendary
Seven Woods and its magical environment make him forget the bitterness born of
political struggles. The poet expresses the idea:
I have heard the pigeons of the
seven woods
Make their faint thunder, and the
garden bees
Hum in the lime tree - flowers’ and
put away
The unavailing outcries and the old
bitterness
That empty the heart.
These lines call up to mind Stephen
Gill’s poem Invisible Hand in which
he underlines the quietitude of nature as Yeats does.
It is a lyric
that use compassion
to wash ingrained marks
from the walls of savage beliefs.
Even if ears are blocked
and the mouths locked
silence communicates
(Shrine, 118)
The Wild Swans at Coole is the last significant nature poem of W.B. Yeats.
It was the title poem of the volume published in 1919. It seems to be modeled
on Wordworth's Tintern Abbey, which
he wrote during his second visit to the banks of
I have looked upon those brilliant
creatures
And now my heart is sore
All’s changed since I, hearing at
twilight
The first time on this shore
The bell beat of their wings above
my head, trod with a lighter tread.
(From Wild Swan At Coole (1919) 129)
Like Yeats, Stephen Gill seems
overjoyed and overawed by the solitude and beauty, which are essential
characteristics of nature. Nature’s solitude, however vast pervasive, may be
its reign, can not be enjoyed with a hungry belly. As a matter of fact, it
sounds illogical and inhuman to idealize nature when the hunger is eating into
ones vitals. Gill, as does Yeats, is overwhelmed by the reign of peace nature
provides and uses derogatory terms for hunger.
He eulogizes nature in the poem Domain
of Peace.
I am often
allured
by the power of
heavens
in the elegant
brilliance
of the sunshine
that streams from
the mystic land
of serenity
beyond greed’s range
where the specter of
hunger does not storm the abode of peace
to shake its
occupants with terror
(Songs before shrine, 112)
Except a few of his poems wherein
Gill seems to give a mystifying view of nature, in majority of them, he draws
on nature human metaphors. Needless to add, it would imply how the power of
nature could motivate human beings to realize such ever cherished ideals as
nobility, courage, freedom. Unlike Eliot who shows a marked abomination to
nature by linking it to romantics, Gill generously treats beauty of spring
sunshine, freedom of wind and loftiness of clouds. At the same time he shows
his concern at degradation of environment and depletion of natural resources.
Thus he joins the movement to save the planet earth from environmental hazards.
To the chagrin of environment activists, apocalyptic bourgeois motives have
caused damage to ecology. As a result, jungles, zameen, Jal, Vayu (
No one can buy
nor sell
the blessings of the skies
the warmth of valleys.
No one can buy
nor sell
the freedom of the winds
the grace of the lakes
the dignity of palm tree
the mystery of the ocean
the sobriety of jungles
and the songs of the seasons (Shrine,
41)
Like Yeats, Gill seems to be
enchanted by the beauty of nature manifested in its various objects. He
however, should have seen that nothing remains sacrosanct when bourgeois profit
motives alone operate in undertaking development projects. Everything under the
sky turns into a salable item.
But differing from Yeats and Eliot,
since the former was overawed by Nature, and latter under rated it, Gill believes
in its humanistic side. Instead of eulogizing the spring sunshine for its own
sake, he underscores and demonstrates how it fulfils a human need and enhances
joy when it falls on river and lake. So he seems concerned with the fact in Sun in Spring:
Which lake or river
house or field
a bride’s gown
leaf or tree
a traveler’s head
or infant’s feet
will ever receive
in the beginning of spring
the rising sun’s
renovating beams
(Songs Before shrine, 110)
In the poem a “Breeze That is Free”,
Gill categorically speaks for growing trees as the environmentalists do. He
discourages intellectualism that, too, he believes, has polluted the planet by
producing too much of thought. He shows concern at how the intellectual’s love
for scholarship has turned them indifferent to nature and environment. He would
want them to look for the treasure that a field of trees possesses. The idea is
effectively conveyed in the following lines.
If I were a breeze
I should lull the learned
to bar the door of his thinking
from breeding substance
that pollutes our planet
and fill him with a treasure
that is possessed by the fields
filled with trees
(Songs
Before Shrine, 107)
Further more,
through his acute sensuous power the poet has fed his eyes on the wings of butterfly.
He has appreciated smiling flowers, and also enjoyed the smell of fresh water
of lakes. This, however, does not imply he has turned away from the sufferings
of man. In poem I Have Seen, Gill is conscious of the
predicament of man in the street.
Famished walking skeletons
bodies resting enshrouded
forlorn infants and old
sad sights of the sisters
mute messages of the eyes
dealing with dears
atrocities never told
flood in emotions crushed
souls of the wounded
the surge of the wishes
(Songs
Before Shrine, 103)
To conclude, both poets have been
overawed by the reign of peace that nature affords. Gill, however, looks at
nature from wide perspective, using nature for attainment of great human
concerns.
Works Cited
1)
Auden, W.H. quoted by peter Faulkner, Yeats,
2)
Bloom, Harold quoted by Martin, Augustine, Preface to The Collected Poem of W.B. Yeats,
3)
Drett, R.L. and Jones. A.R. eds. Preface to Lyrical
Ballads :
Wordsworth .
Tagore, Rabindra Nath. “Poet Yeats”. Poetry in Theory: an anthology, 1900-2000. Ed. Cook, John.
4)
Gill, Stephen, Shrine:
poems about peace and social concerns.
5)
Gill, Stephan, Songs
before shrine,
6)
Keats John, ode to a Nightingale, Master Poems of English Language. Ed. Williams, Oscar.
7)
8)
Ravichandran, T. “Green Dove in the shrine; Eco concern in
Stephen Gill’s Shrine”. Discovering Stephan Gill. Ed. Agrawal, Nilanshu
Kumar.
9.Wolf, Humbert.
“Alfered Tennyson.” Fifteen Poets.
9)
Yeats, W.B., The Collected
Poems of W.B.Yeats. All quotations of Yeats are taken from the same edition
quoted earlier and have been referred to in parenthesis by page number and name
of the collection along with year of publication.
10) Hines, George. Stephen Gill and His Works.
Authors
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. G.L.
Gautam has contributed papers on Stephen Gill even before. He teaches English Literture
at